Wednesday, May 09, 2012

Something to Squawk About

Note: This is my first attempt authoring a post with blogsy on the iPad, sooo ....

Several years ago a class C tower controller chided a student I was instructing for mistakenly squawking altitude while taxing, remarking that doing so "cluttered up" his screen. Recently an astute reader pointed out a change to transponder operation procedure contained in the February 2012 Aeronautical Information Manual 4-1-20, to wit:

Civil and military transponders should be turned to the “on" or normal altitude reporting position prior to moving on the airport surface to ensure the aircraft is visible to ATC surveillance systems.

This is a significant change from the previous procedure of keeping the transponder in "stand by" mode and squawking "altitude" just before departure. If you're operating an aircraft with a transponder that provides a "gnd" or "ground" mode, my understanding is that mode meets the new requirement.

The motivation for this change would seem to be to prepare pilots and controllers for the deployment of ground surveillance systems, current and future (NextGen/ADS-B). But there might be some problems and here's why.

ATC Not up to Speed

After learning this change had taken effect, I queried two different ground controller (one class C in northern CA and on class D in southern CA). I was startled to hear that neither controller had heard anything about the change nor had they been briefed on it. This leaves dilligent pilots and instructors in an odd position: Should they adopt and teach the new procedure or not? I'd be interested in hearing from other tower or ground controllers on their experiences.

Traffic System Conflicts

The other issue has to do with TIS and other traffic alerting systems (TAS) installed in aircraft. For instance, my initial experience in Cirrus aircraft several year ago revealed an annoying problem: All it took was a pilot holding short with their transponder turned on and the cockpit would be flooded with enough aural traffic alerts to drown out all other radio communications. Thank goodness newer aircraft with TAS have a mute function. TIS-equipped aircraft can suffer from the same issue, barking "TRAFFIC" at inoportune times. G1000 aircraft provide a means to turn off traffic, but this isn't the best use of time in single-pilot operations.

Unintended Consequences

Being a tech nerd who's had my share of close encounters during ground operations, I'm all for technological solutions. What should a pilot do if instructed to taxi before being assigned a squawk code? In these cases I'm planning to set the transponder code to 1200 set the mode to "on." It may take some time to work out the wrinkles and get the FAA, ATC, pilots, and aircraft equipment working toward the same goal.

 

Sunday, May 06, 2012

Livin' the Dream

More substantive posts are still in the oven. In the mean time, here are some recent photos ...

Flight of the Cougar

Inbound KPAO
It's always sunny in SoCal, Right?
Unusual Attitude with Contrail
"End Fire" glide slope antenna for the new KAPC ILS 36L
Talkin' to "Show Time" (Lemore MOA)
Is it always cloudy over Panoche?
Sikorsky Skycrane at rest
Vectors KSEE LOC D
San Pablo Bay
One of the few aircraft where an iPad yoke mount actually works.

Tuesday, May 01, 2012

Out on a Limb, G1000 Style



As the FAA continues the inexorable march toward eliminating most ground-based radio navigation aids it would seem pilots who learned radio navigation with NDBs and VORs have two choices: Continue to deny the ever-growing dominance of Area Navigation (RNAV and GPS) or jump in and start swimming with the rest of us. While there's a lot to like about RNAV, the complex implementation of these systems and procedures makes for a steep learning curve. And the learning never stops because RNAV rough edges always seem to crop up when you least expect them. Here's a situation that may leave even a seasoned G1000 jockey asking "Why's it doing that?"



Late Missed Approach

Getting a late start on the missed approach is risky business, especially on a non-precision affair when the missed approach point is some distance from the runway threshold. You might think this could never happen to you, but here are just a couple of scenarios where you could find yourself executing the missed approach late in the game.

Scenario #1: You break out of the clouds well before the missed approach point (MAP), and continue descending. Soon you realize you're behind the aircraft and you won't be able to land in the touchdown zone. So you decide to climb back to the circling MDA and circle to land, but as you climb, you re-enter the clouds and must execute the missed approach.

Scenario #2: You break out on an approach and have the required visibility to continue for a straight-in landing. Only on short final do you realize there's a disabled aircraft on the runway. If you prefer, substitute a herd of elk for a disabled aircraft. VoilĂ ! Late execution of the missed approach.

You Want Me to Do What?

When starting the missed approach beyond the MAP and below the minimum descent altitude, the guidance given by a WAAS GPS can be confusing unless you know what to expect. I first noticed this while supervising a pilot flying a practice RNAV RWY 32 into Cloverdale. This brings up a third possible scenario: Flying a practice approach with the plan to do a touch and go landing and then fly the published missed approach. At the MDA, I asked the pilot to look up and continue visually so as to continue a stabilized approach for the touch-and-go. Note the 881 foot altitude nestled between TAKUY and NATIC? More on that later.

At the MAP, below MDA, on glide angle to runway.
During climb out after the touch and go, the pilot pressed the SUSP softkey on the G1000 Primary Flight Display (PDF) and we both expected instructions to execute a climbing left turn to 6000 feet. Instead, the G1000 wanted us to climb straight ahead to 881 feet, significantly below the circling MDA.

Past the runway, waay past the MAP, G1000 says to climb to 881 feet.
The pilot donned his view-limiting device and dutifully complied with the machine's instructions while I monitored the situation (squirming in my seat, I might add). After reaching 881 feet, the G1000 finally told us to start the climbing left turn to 6000 feet. Ironically, this put us right over some of the highest terrain in the airport vicinity at an altitude that was just barely sufficient for VFR.

Good climb rate to 6000 feet, but still a lot of yellow and red showing ...

Why Would a GPS Do That?

The first important lesson has to do with why a G1000 (or presumably any WAAS GPS) would exhibit this behavior when operating below the MDA, near or past the MAP. Instrument approaches are coded using ARINC-424 by the company who creates and supplies the database (Jeppesen, in this case). The GPS in your panel executes the instructions contained in the database when you execute an instrument procedure. When I learned this I had a deeper appreciation of the complexity of creating GPS databases and found myself less likely to complain about database subscription prices.

While I don't claim to possess detailed knowledge of ARINC-424, a brief explanation from the folks at the FAA's Instrument Approach Procedures division did shed some light. When you pass the final approach fix (FAF), descend well below the MDA, and then press the SUSP softkey, a CA leg (climb-to-altitude) becomes active as a sort of glue between the final approach segment and the missed approach segment. The altitude for the CA leg is computed at the MAP as if you were on the final approach segment, descending from 2500 feet at the FAF at an angle of 3.09 degrees. Since the MAP is 4.9 miles from the FAF, performing a little math shows that you would descend to about 880 feet at the MAP. This computed altitude is even shown in the flight plan, between the MAP and the missed approach holding waypoint. Some pilots mistakenly confuse this altitude with the MDA when, in fact, it is considerably lower. Don't be one of those pilots!


Keep in mind that whenever you choose to operate below the MDA, you are required to have one or more of the visual references described in 14 CFR 91.175.

If you descend below the computed altitude of 881 feet and press SUSP, the CA leg becomes active and the GPS will first instruct you to climb straight ahead to 881 feet. After reaching 881 feet, it will then tell you to start the climbing left turn to NATIC. If you remain at 1440 feet all the way to the MAP and then press SUSP, the GPS will skip the CA leg and immediately instruct you to start the climbing left turn to 6000 feet and proceed to NATIC. Remember that a computed altitude can be displayed in the flight plan and should not be confused with the MDA.

Keep it Straight and Simple

Which brings us to the second lesson: Anytime you find yourself operating below the MDA, especially in rapidly changing weather conditions, you'd be wise to have an escape strategy of your own and not just blindly do what your GPS tells you to do. In the approach cited above, it may be safer to perform climbing turns over the airport until you  reach the MDA, then press SUSP and follow the GPS's instructions. Lastly, remember to fly the procedure as published and that any computed altitudes displayed in the G1000's flight plan should not be confused with the MDA. You may be saying to yourself that this sort of thing could never happen to you, but never say "never." Someday you could find you and your G1000 out on this very limb.